Category Archives: Film Review

Documentary Film Review: The Starfish Throwers

starfish throwers

I have been excitedly waiting for a chance to share my review of this film! It just finally became available on video, so I thought I would post about it now that you can track it down and see it for yourselves!

Once upon a time, a man stepped out onto the beach and noticed a little girl on the sand throwing starfish into the water. He walked up to her and asked, “What are you doing?”

“Throwing the starfish back into the sea,” she replied.

The man shook his head at the girl’s naivete, “Every day the tide washes in thousands of starfish to dry out and die on the beach. You throw a few back today and tomorrow there will be more. You cannot possibly make a difference.”

As she picked up another starfish and threw it into the ocean, the girl replied, “I made a difference for that one.”

The Starfish Throwers is a documentary film that chronicles the lives of three people who, like the girl in the old story, have decided that even if they cannot do it all, they’re going to do something. The subjects are: a teenage girl named Katie who gardens to feed the needy, a retired teacher named Allan who makes and delivers thousands of sandwiches to the hungry in Minneapolis every night, and a five-star chef in India, Narayanan, who walks away from his successful career to care for the “untouchables” in his culture’s caste system. I liked the subjects they chose because the film doesn’t just focus on the third world, but looks at people working for change in the American South and North, as well as India. The subjects vary in age, gender, and financial background. None of them were professionals in a non-profit, and their organizations don’t have big budgets or famous supporters. They are simply three average people who are each driven from within to do what they can for the hungry and poor. And they face challenges. Katie’s family has hit some financial snags and she keeps getting discouraging emails from people who think she’s too young and should let grownups handle the needy while she has a more typical time being a teenager. Allan is forced to take some time off to be treated for prostate cancer. Narayanan has the whole caste system against him, and his own family struggles to understand why he would “throw away” his career as a professional chef to care for the destitute.

So obviously you guys know that this topic is my passion as well. A few months ago the trailer for this movie was going around on Facebook. I loved the trailer and it led me to the film’s website. There I saw a listing of places where you could see the film, and one of them was here in Minneapolis. I talked my family into going out that night for dinner and a documentary, and it ended up being one of the best family outings we’ve done. The film was played at Casket Cinema, a little art studio in an old brick building full of free-spirited artists (just so you know, the name isn’t as creepy as it sounds. The old building is the Casket Arts building, named for whatever business built it way back when. There are no caskets involved.) Just being there awakened my old passion to create. The artist who shows the films had filled his studio with mismatched furniture and projected the film on a big white wall. He provided free popcorn and took up a collection to pay for the film.

The movie definitely lived up to my expectations. I was touched and inspired. At the end of the film, the host introduced the director, Jesse Roesler, who happens to be from the Minneapolis area, and to Allan, one of the film’s subjects. It was terrific to be able to ask questions and hear more from the people behind the documentary. Casket Cinema collected non-perishable food at the gathering, and the filmmakers opted not to charge for that particular showing so that the collection could go to Mark’s nonprofit, Minneapolis Recreation Development. The film sparked deep conversations in my family, and J asked if we could go back to see more documentaries at the studio/theater.

I highly recommend this film. It is available to purchase on dvd, though I do not believe it is available on Amazon Prime or Netflix (Yet – I hope it will be eventually). I’m attaching the trailer, and some links so you can visit the film’s website and Facebook page, as well as the websites of the three non-profits chronicled in the film.

The Starfish Throwers (website for the movie) – (The Starfish Throwers – Facebook)

Katie’s Krops –
Minneapolis Recreation Development –
Akshaya Trust –

Casket Cinema – (Casket Cinema – Facebook)

Documentary Film Review – A Place at the Table

Film Review - A Place at the Table

Good Food Shelf Friday morning everyone! I have a new kind of post for you today, my review of the documentary A Place at the Table. It’s available on Netflix, as well as Amazon Instant Video (free for Prime members).

Before I jump into that, I have some exciting news. Within the last 10 days I have gotten confirmation that BOTH of the articles I recently submitted to online magazines were accepted! The (original) piece in Mamalode won’t be up until April 7, but the Everyday Windshield article (a reworking of the blog post on Meal Ministry) went up on their site this week. You can view it HERE. This is really exciting for me as I love to write and play with words, but have previously only done writing for school, this blog, and my on-again/off-again personal journal.

But back to the movie…

A Place at the Table was made by Magnolia Pictures, the people who made Food, Inc. It was directed by Kristi Jacobson and Lori Silverbush, and released in June, 2013.

The premise/thesis of this film is that farm subsidy programs spend billions of taxpayer dollars every year subsidizing corporate agri-business at the expense of American families. The subsidy programs were designed to end the Great Depression, but due in no small part to lobbyists, they were allowed to continue after the Depression ended, and they continue to this day. As family farms have given way to corporate food production, the subsidies intended for farm families have gone to these corporations as well. Additionally, the crops we subsidize are not fresh fruits and vegetables or whole grains. They’re mostly commodities like corn, soybeans, and wheat, which are used for livestock and manufacturing more than food.

The film primarily bounces back and forth between a single mom of two in Philadelphia, and a community in Colorado. There are also segments of a teacher in Mississippi introducing her class to nutrition after she herself was diagnosed with diabetes. A number of experts contributed, including healthcare workers, nutrition experts, a chef, and a legislator (Rep. James McGovern, D, Mass.).

In 1968, CBS aired a documentary called Hunger in America which was extremely influential and led to the virtual end of hunger in America. When the recession hit in the 1980s, all of that progress was undone as the number of individuals in need of assistance skyrocketed while funding decreased. In response, emergency charities (food banks and soup kitchens) sprung up or expanded all over the country to meet the need. The film applauds these private programs for the work they do in communities across the country, but it argues that charity is a band-aid, not a cure.

A few things the film does well:

They did a nice job explaining that obesity and hunger are not opposites; they’re “neighbors.” When a family has a very limited food budget, processed, shelf-stable, nutritionally barren foods are available more readily and for less money than fresh fruits and vegetables.

The film hit on the danger of nutritional deficiency in the first three years of a child’s life. Even short-term periods of malnutrition can have a permanent impact on a child’s cognitive development and some of the potential that is lost cannot be recovered.

They point out that legislators, by and large, cannot relate to the challenges of hunger. Without personal experience with the stress of trying to feed a family on very little, the statistics mean very little to them (and to many of us watching the film). School lunches and other government feeding programs are just budget items to them. There is a lot of talk about school lunch programs in the film. They describe the immense challenges that schools face in making healthy food for kids on a budget that hasn’t increased (except to keep up with inflation) since the 1970s. I know from my personal grocery shopping experience that produce has gone up a lot higher than just keeping up with the inflation of the dollar!

They talk a little about the larger cost of hunger in America. It’s not just about food stamps and government programs. Hunger costs taxpayers who foot the bill for malnutrition related conditions in the population. Healthcare, disability, unemployment, therapies and special education programs all require more resources in a population with high numbers of malnourished. The film argues that more money for hunger relief up front becomes less money for other social services later.

A few issues:

The film is very political. One reviewer on Amazon called it “Marxist Trash and Poison mixed with Truth.” It leans left. Way left. The implicit villains are Republicans and industry. There is no consideration for how these single moms became single moms or where the kids’ dad(s) are. What about personal responsibility? This is a tough question for me. On one hand, I believe in personal responsibility: in not having kids you can’t feed, in working for what you need. On the other hand, I know that things happen. Illness, injury, death, job loss, inflation, etc. A number of things out of a person’s control can take them from responsible to destitute. I don’t really have an answer for this. All I can say for sure is that children cannot control where and when they’re born. Punishing the kids for the failings of their parents is misguided, unfair, and dangerous.

Editing choices presented the story they wanted you to have, not necessarily the full story. In Colorado, ten-year-old Rosie introduces us to her life. In the story she mentions sharing a bed with her sister, but we never see the sister. Her mom talks about her job as a waitress, but we never hear anything about dad. Grandma is interviewed several times, and she mentions that 7 people live in their house, yet we are introduced to only the three. Clearly we are not getting all the information. Perhaps too many characters would have been confusing, I don’t know. All I know is that there is a lot that went unexplained, which made me wonder if we’re getting truth or fabrication. It’s like the famous Depression photos taken by Dorothea Lange. She is famous for the picture “Migrant Mother” (pictured below). Lange intentionally left dad out of the photo because it was more powerful and heartbreaking without a big, strong man in the picture.

by Dorothea Lange

As many reviewers on Amazon have pointed out, there is no mention of one simple solution to life without produce – gardening. Community gardens, deck and window plants, etc. – there are a lot of options to do something no matter what your circumstances, and it costs very little. It’s not a total solution, but it’s an area that went completely unexplored in this film.


I’m glad I watched A Place at the Table. It wasn’t the definitive exploration of hunger in America, but it made many good points. My biggest takeaway is that I am going to make sure my food shelf donations aren’t junk food; I don’t want to be another source of the problem. I am also more interested in the debate over school lunches and funding the school lunch program.

If you are an open-minded individual who wants to understand some of the complex issues of hunger in America, I recommend the movie. If you have strong, inflexible political views on either side, you will either love it as proof of your ideals and be blind to its imperfections, or you will hate it as leftist propaganda and see only its imperfections. If you can go into it with the mindset that it is not perfect but it has things to teach me, I think you’ll gain some valuable insights. I know I did.

Follow-up on my New Year’s resolutions (see that post HERE): I set a goal of packing meals at Feed My Starving Children 6 times in 2015, and I’m falling behind. I’ve only been there once so far, and have scheduled a visit for next week. There is plenty of year left, but I need to get in gear! My other resolution was to have a Food Shelf Friday dinner once a week 50 out of the 52 weeks in 2015. I’m going to miss my first one this week. Someone in my house has to be somewhere every. single. night. We might be able to share a family meal on Sunday night (in which case I have a box of red beans and rice and two cans of corn ready to go for both us and the food bank), but if it doesn’t work this will be our first week without an FSF dinner since Christmas. I hate when life gets in the way of how I want to live… On that deep thought, I’ll let you go. Have a wonderful week, and don’t forget to share your thoughts in the comments!